Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:51:59 +0200
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux-RT-Users <linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210331085213.GZ3697@techsingularity.net>
References: <20210329120648.19040-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20210331085213.GZ3697@techsingularity.net>

On Wed, Mar 31 2021 at 09:52, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Ingo, Thomas or Peter, is there any chance one of you could take a look
> at patch "[PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to
> local_lock" from this series? It's partially motivated by PREEMPT_RT. More
> details below.

Sure.

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead
  - From: Mel Gorman
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead
  - From: Mel Gorman

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to local_lock
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] rt: cpufreq: Fix cpu hotplug hang
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux