On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:30:39PM -0500, John Kacur wrote: > > I think I see the problem, the patch > > rt-numa: Move thread placement code to rt-numa library > > > > added the fatal if numa_failed. > > Sorry about the mess, I thought we can relay on libnuma. The concept to > depend on compile time on a library and not during runtime escaped my > attention. No problem, I should have caught this myself in code review. I had honestly forgotten that when we made numa a compile time requirement that we made it so that it was not a runtime requirement, even though I wrote most of the code to achieve that. > > > Thanks for testing. I'll send a patch to put it back the old way. > > Thanks John! >
