Re: [rteval PATCH 0/2] Relax some architecture specific constraints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Here are a couple of patches that enable running rteval on arm64
> targets. A previous version was sent at [0].
>
> The first patch removes the requirement for having a "model name" in
> /proc/cpuinfo. This isn't provided on an arm64 kernel unless running
> in "compat" mode.
>
> The second patch uses the default kernel compilation target instead of
> "bzImage" and "modules". "bzImage" isn't used on arm64. Instead of
> building knowledge of architecture-specific targets it maybe better to
> build the default. The default should build the kernel and modules
> anyways.
>
> More details in the patch commit log.
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/877doa1uwx.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Punit Agrawal (2):
>   rteval: cyclictest.py: Make 'model name' optional
>   rteval: cyclictest.py: Make build targets architecture independent
>
>  rteval/modules/loads/kcompile.py         | 2 +-
>  rteval/modules/measurement/cyclictest.py | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Ping!

If there are no comments / issues with the patches, it would be
great if they can be merged.

Thanks,
Punit



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux