On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 05:49:47PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 19.02.21 17:39, Peter Xu wrote: > > Now I tried to fix it but it seems you don't really like my fix. > > Sorry I didn't want to say I don't like your fix. I just said, I would > appreciate if things would stay consistent. But then it seems there is > not much interest in this. > > > Would you propose yours instead? I would be more than glad if your version is > > better then I'm happy to drop mine. Otherwise I'll still prefer to have this > > patch merged to unbreak it first. > > I don't care too much. If this patch fixes your problem don't let me > stop you. It's not really my problem, I can compile my own binary. It's just that I want to have it working as usual for anyone using it. Also it'll be great to have it fixed sooner for our downstream so our QE won't be affect. I don't want the unbreak to be delayed by any further cleanup idea anymore - I am totally not against that, but again I think they can be done on top of a working tree. Sorry if my wording was too harsh - I apologize for that. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
