On 2020-08-18 08:42:50 [-0700], Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > So what you are saying that this patch isn't needed v5.0.19-rt10+ > > because local_bh_disable() acts there as a lock. Repost is then with Tom > > in Cc because he will be the first one to apply to the v4.19 tree. And > > please shrink the patch description to a sane amount of information. > > Sure, but which Tom are you refering to? Tom Zanussi (Cc:). The v4.19 kernel is top most kernel which requires the change [0]. So it should start with Tom and drop down. [0] as per https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/preempt_rt_versions > Thanks, > Davidlohr Sebastian
