Hi Steve, On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 15:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:35:12 +0200 > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 4.19.132-rt59 stable release. > > > > > > This release is just an update to the new stable 4.19.132 > > > version and no RT specific changes have been made. > > > > > > You can get this release via the git tree at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable- > > > rt.git > > > > > > branch: v4.19-rt > > > Head SHA1: 1eebf4069aa37e54330cce9a42608517ea6996fe > > > > > > Or to build 4.19.132-rt59 directly, the following patches should > > > be > > > applied: > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > But now I am confused, I completely missed announcements for > > v4.19.127-rt55 to v4.19.131-rt58. > > > > And for example -rt56 is not listed in > > > > https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/sha256sums.asc > > > > ...aha, and the versions do not have signed tags, either: > > > > pavel@amd:~/cip/k$ git show v4.19.131-rt58 > > fatal: ambiguous argument 'v4.19.131-rt58': unknown revision or > > path not in the working tree. > > > > Is that because they were created just as quick steps towards > > -rt59? > > > > Ah, I was about to say this is something that Kate keeps reminding me > to add to the wiki, but looking, I already did! > > https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/documentation/start > > "Tagging policy of the PREEMPT_RT stable releases. Each PREEMPT_RT > stable release is tagged with the version number of the upstream > Linux > stable kernel as well as its own “-rt” counter that is appended. The > -rt counter will increment for the following: > > - When forward ported to the latest upstream Linux stable version. > - When any merge with a upstream Linux stable causes a conflict. > - When a backport of the PREEMPT_RT development branch is done. > > A backport will not be done with a forward port of a stable version. > They will be done separately, and tagged separately." > > Tom, I sign all tags, we probably should be consistent with that too. > Yeah, so do I, it's just that the srt script doesn't push the intervening tags (but does push the release tags). Tom > -- Steve
