Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:36:51 +0200
Cc: fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200616204649.GA4914@lenoir>
References: <20200520140402.358880-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com> <20200520162400.GA8800@lenoir> <20200520164925.GM10078@localhost.localdomain> <20200520170215.GB8800@lenoir> <20200520184710.GO10078@localhost.localdomain> <20200521004443.GB15455@lenoir> <20200521170020.GQ10078@localhost.localdomain> <20200615210743.GA21371@lenoir> <20200616065757.GA446382@localhost.localdomain> <20200616204649.GA4914@lenoir>

Hi,

On 16/06/20 22:46, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:57:57AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Sure. Let me know if you find anything.
> 
> I managed to reproduce. With "threadirqs" and without
> "tsc=reliable". I see tons of spurious TIMER softirqs.
> Investigation begins! I'll let you know.

Gentle ping. Any new findings about this issue?

Thanks,

Juri

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker

References:
- [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Juri Lelli
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Juri Lelli
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Juri Lelli
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Juri Lelli
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Juri Lelli
- Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
  - From: Frederic Weisbecker

Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] 4.14.186-rt86
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] tick/sched: update full_nohz status after SCHED dep is cleared
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]