On 4/21/20 22:51, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-04-17 10:50:35 [+0800], Liwei Song wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/17/20 01:09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> On 2020-04-13 12:18:17 [+0800], Liwei Song wrote:
>>>> Interrupts are off during resume from RAM, this will triger a warning
>>>> when allocate memory in non-preemptible context on RT since commit
>>>> b5d5bc970f209 ("mm: Warn on memory allocation in non-preemptible
>>>> context on RT"), exclude suspend from this warning check.
>>>
>>> Is this the ACPI backtrace or do you have something else?
>>
>> Yes, there are two backtrace here include one ACPI Calltrace, another one
>> is from iommu:
>>
>> 1).
>> [ 88.992342] ? acpi_os_allocate_zeroed+0x28/0x2a
>> [ 88.992349] acpi_os_allocate_zeroed+0x28/0x2a
>> [ 88.992351] acpi_ns_internalize_name+0x4b/0xa0
>> [ 88.992354] ? trace_preempt_on+0x2a/0x120
>> [ 88.992360] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x6f/0xd7
>> [ 88.992362] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x90
>> [ 88.992367] ? down_timeout+0x3c/0x60
>> [ 88.992372] ? acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x4d/0x70
>> [ 88.992378] acpi_ns_get_node+0x43/0x5d
>>
>> 2).
>> [ 88.991560] Call Trace:
>> [ 88.991561] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x90
>> [ 88.991563] ? iommu_suspend+0x4f/0x1c0
>> [ 88.991569] iommu_suspend+0x4f/0x1c0
>> [ 88.991572] syscore_suspend+0x9b/0x3e0
>> [ 88.991575] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1fb/0xec0
>> [ 88.991579] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4f/0x80
>> [ 88.991580] ? prb_unlock+0x18/0x80
>> [ 88.991585] pm_suspend.cold+0x326/0x37b
>>
>> During suspend phase the only way to make preemptible() happy is
>> enable interrupt before kcalloc/kmalloc/kzalloc, but enable interrupt
>> may cause some unknown issue if device access I/O address which already
>> suspend, so I think it's better and safe to exclude suspend from this
>> warning check.
>
> At this point all CPUs are down so there is no scheduling. No lock
> within the buddy allocator should not be acquired by another task. That
> looks good.
> But: calling into the buddy allocator goes via allocate_slab() which
> enables interrupts.
I trace the invoke path, allocate_slab() will not be called during
suspend, and if enable interrupt before request memory when suspend, it will cause
many ACPI calltrace, kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() will not
be called during suspend, while slab_alloc_node() will be called,
how about just exclude suspend from slab_alloc_node()?
Thanks,
Liwei.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Liwei.
>
> Sebastian
>
