Re: [PATCH v2] Import a new test, jitterz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John,
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2019-2020 Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + */
> Should the manpage mention that the original idea comes from sysjitter?
> While I'm asking that, just to play devil's advocate, why are we not just
> forking sysjitter and adapting it to our needs? What advantage to we get
> by re-implemnting this?

sysjitter is not a well known nor a well supported tool, the attribution in the commit log is enough.

jitterz was started because of limitations in sysjitter. So the effort would be to fork and address those limitations and upstream.

Tom




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux