Re: [PATCH 1/4] tracing: Consolidate some synth_event_trace code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Steve,

On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 17:43 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:55:31 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > @@ -2053,24 +2053,72 @@ int synth_event_trace_start(struct
> > trace_event_file *file,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synth_event_trace_start);
> >  
> > -static int save_synth_val(struct synth_field *field, u64 val,
> > +int __synth_event_add_val(const char *field_name, u64 val,
> 
> Hmm, shouldn't __synth_event_add_val() still be static?
> 

It's a new function, but yeah, it should be static.

Tom

> -- Steve
> 
> >  			  struct synth_event_trace_state
> > *trace_state)
> >  {
> > -	struct synth_trace_event *entry = trace_state->entry;
> > +	struct synth_field *field = NULL;
> > +	struct synth_trace_event *entry;
> > +	struct synth_event *event;
> > +	int i, ret = 0;
> > +



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux