Re: devel branches in rt-tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Hello John,
> 
> I wonder about the two branches
> 
> 	unstable/devel/latest (at 07a73b6ecf748c424c676f1ba8030ca678360e0e)
> 	unstable/devel/latest-devel (at c5aa9a877b146846da21e5d63597a2a09a3c96d7)
> 
> in the rt-tests.git repository.
> 
> According to
> 
> 	git range-diff origin/unstable/devel/latest...origin/unstable/devel/latest-devel
> 
> the two contain mostly identical commits. It seems to me
> unstable/devel/latest is a rebased version of
> unstable/devel/latest-devel as the commit dates are newer and two
> patches that are duplicated in .../latest-devel[1] only occur once each in
> .../latest. Also .../latest has 5 more commits.
> 
> Does that mean unstable/devel/latest-devel is the one to ignore?
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> [1] git range-diff 97632deddf783249e0e3d34630792c7696b7d5d5...90449d993fc9973381f1c37fbda37c39a43ab503
> 
> -- 

My original intention was to do development in the devel branch, and 
update latest for new releases. I think that people have found this 
confusing though, so I'm thinking of doing away with the latest-devel 
branch. You are correct that latest is currently more up to date than 
latest-devel

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux