Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:48:42 +0100
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xdp-newbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAD56B7dwKDKnrCjpGmrnxz2P0QpNWU3CGBvOtqg3RBx3ejPh9g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD56B7dwKDKnrCjpGmrnxz2P0QpNWU3CGBvOtqg3RBx3ejPh9g@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019-11-12 17:42:42 [-0500], Paul Thomas wrote:
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Could please enable CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and check if the kernel
complains?

> thanks,
> Paul

Sebastian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel
  - From: Paul Thomas

References:
- xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel
  - From: Paul Thomas

Prev by Date: [PATCH] sched/core: migrate_enable() must access takedown_cpu_task on !HOTPLUG_CPU
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RT] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT
Previous by thread: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel
Next by thread: Re: xdpsock poll with 5.2.21rt kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux