On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 14:19 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2019-09-26 11:52:42 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote: > > Looks good, thanks! > > Thanks, just released. > Moving forward. It would be nice to have some DL-dev feedback on DL > patch. For the remaining once, could please throw Steven's > stress-test-hostplug-cpu-script? If that one does not complain I don't > see a reason why not apply the patches (since they improve performance > and do not break anything while doing so). I'd been using a quick-and-dirty script that does something similar, and ran it along with rcutorture, a kernel build, and something that randomly changes affinities -- though with these loads I have to ignore occasional RCU forward progress complaints that Paul said were expected with this version of the RCU code, XFS warnings that happen even on unmodified non-RT, and sometimes a transitory netdev timeout that is not that surprising given the heavy load and affinity stress (I get it without these patches as well, though it takes longer). I just ran Steven's script (both alone and with the other stuff above) and saw no difference. -Scott
