On 2019-09-11 17:57:26 [+0100], Scott Wood wrote: > It's already used for one situation other than acquiring a lock, and the > next patch will add another, so change the name to avoid confusion. I know it has been suggested but please don't rename it, keep it as is. The _only_ reason why you are having it is to avoid a RCU related warning. PeterZ asked if we could maybe utilize a task-state bit for this annotation instead. So I will look into this and change the mechanism that is used to something different if it is preferred over this one and you don't have to worry about it. Please use what is here at the moment. > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@xxxxxxxxxx> Sebastian
