Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 20:57:46 +0200
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dunc.mcphie@xxxxxxxxx, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAD56B7fnVpmiE+m71zHSNuQw49GWJJ0ySGUD3Zc2mih_CxUjpg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD56B7eF_KhWvg=m6iy5YSJF-81v-zcmX7+8Kd0wGMrALHwU1A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907170111160.1767@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAD56B7eswTRxbeA8foXyVVZ7Bd+_y40dtOLkHxuAf4kVge7VDg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907171001150.1767@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907171009280.1767@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907171101150.1767@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907171220400.1767@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAD56B7eomeb5Lr2juFWtZmtqSx3SkPijW03QZz8xv39He26PrA@mail.gmail.com> <20190813095306.xqgq3uusdpj7dhy7@linutronix.de> <CAD56B7fnVpmiE+m71zHSNuQw49GWJJ0ySGUD3Zc2mih_CxUjpg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716

On 2019-08-15 14:00:34 [-0400], Paul Thomas wrote:
> After correctly applying this patch I do not see large latencies, >15M
> iterations and counting.
Perfect.

> thanks,
> Paul

Sebastian

References:
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
- Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
  - From: Paul Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
Next by Date: [PATCH rt-tests v0 0/4] Fix gcc warning
Previous by thread: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
Next by thread: [ANNOUNCE] LPC 2019: Submit a topic for the RT Micro-conference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]