4.19.37-rt20-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> The locks (timeline->lock and rq->lock) need to be taken with disabled interrupts. This is done in __retire_engine_request() by disabling the interrupts independently of the locks itself. While local_irq_disable()+spin_lock() equals spin_lock_irq() on vanilla it does not on RT. Also, it is not obvious if there is a special reason to why the interrupts are disabled independently of the lock. Enable/disable interrupts as part of the locking instruction. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 5c2c93cbab12..7124510b9131 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -356,9 +356,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(rq)); - local_irq_disable(); - - spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock); GEM_BUG_ON(!list_is_first(&rq->link, &engine->timeline.requests)); list_del_init(&rq->link); spin_unlock(&engine->timeline.lock); @@ -372,9 +370,7 @@ static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters)); atomic_dec(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters); } - spin_unlock(&rq->lock); - - local_irq_enable(); + spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); /* * The backing object for the context is done after switching to the -- 2.20.1
