Re: [PATCH 2/7] iommu/dma-iommu: Split iommu_dma_map_msi_msg in two parts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> +int iommu_dma_prepare_msi(struct msi_desc *desc, phys_addr_t msi_addr)
>  {
> +	struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
>  	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>  	struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	if (!domain || !domain->iova_cookie) {
> +		desc->iommu_cookie = NULL;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
>  
> @@ -908,10 +908,33 @@ void iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
>  	 * of an MSI from within an IPI handler.
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&cookie->msi_lock, flags);
> +	desc->iommu_cookie = iommu_dma_get_msi_page(dev, msi_addr, domain);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cookie->msi_lock, flags);
>  
> +	return (desc->iommu_cookie) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;

No need for the braces.  Also I personally find a:

	if (!desc->iommu_cookie)
		return -ENOMEM;
	return 0;

much more readable, but that might just be personal preference.



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux