On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:25:51 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I noticed this because we hardcode the size in memcpy. Should hard code > it above, otherwise it looks like elt_data->comm may be something other > than TASK_COMM_LEN. Hi Tom, My comments on patch 5 and 6 are the only comments I have on the series. Could you address them and post a v15, and I'll pull them in and start testing them? Thanks! -- Steve
