Re: [PATCH v2] kmemleak: Turn kmemleak_lock to raw spinlock on RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-11-23 12:02:55 [+0100], Andrea Parri wrote:
> > is this an RT-only problem? Because mainline should not allow read->read
> > locking or read->write locking for reader-writer locks. If this only
> > happens on v4.18 and not on v4.19 then something must have fixed it.
> 
> Probably misunderstanding, but I'd say that read->read locking is "the
> norm"...?
> 
> If you don't use qrwlock, readers are also "recursive", in part.,
> 
>   P0			P1
>   read_lock(l)
> 			write_lock(l)
>   read_lock(l)
> 
> won't block P0 on the second read_lock().  (qrwlock somehow complicate
> the analysis; IIUC, they are recursive if and only if in_interrupt().).

ehm, peterz, is that true? My memory on that is that all readers will
block if there is a writer pending.

>   Andrea

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux