On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:34:17PM +0200, luca abeni wrote: > So, I would propose to make the proxy() function of patch more generic, > and not strictly bound to mutexes. Maybe a task structure can contain a > list of tasks for which the task can act as a proxy, and we can have a > function like "I want to act as a proxy for task T" to be invoked when > a task blocks? Certainly possible, but that's something I'd prefer to look at after it all 'works'. The mutex blocking thing doesn't require external interfaces etc..
