Hei hei, Am Montag, 30. Juli 2018, 17:26:15 CEST schrieb Patrick Doyle: > It turns out that there is a v4.9.87-rt65 in the linux-rt tree, but it > doesn't apply to the linux-at91 tree because they have a customized > variant of kernel/softirq.c. (They had to revert an earlier commit on > mainline). Since I am likely to want a newer kernel in the future > anyway, I figured I would try the rebase effort first, and have the > create-a-patch-to-revert-the-revert approach as a plan B. Is there any particular reason to use that tree instead of running vanilla which has good at91 support, also in v4.9? (I am using PREEMPT_RT on top of vanilla v4.9.x with an at91sam9g20.) Greets Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
