Re: [missing 4.16-rt5 patch ?] mm/memcontrol: Don't call schedule_work_on in preemption disabled context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 17:29 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So that css_put() is not a problem? I'm mostly curious in the callback
> which would run irq-off section. How does not get into that code path
> anyway, is there something in the LTP that would trigger that?

No idea.  The only thing I've _met_ is the schedule_work_on() bit.

	-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux