Re: [v4.9 RT 0/6] futex backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  6 Jun 2018 15:31:25 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Julia,
> 
> as mentioned in the stable meeting, here is the futex patch that was
> missing in the v4.9 tree :)
> The futex state in v4.9 was backported from a later kernel at the time
> Peter made the patches. That is why all the fixes which were tagged
> stable did not enter the v4.9 stable tree.
> I had a "deadlock assert in glibc" from pthread_mutex_lock() which did
> not make a lot of sense. After comparing the futex code in latest v4.9
> and v4.14 I identified a few patches which should be backported.
> I haven't seen the issue after applying the patches which follow as a
> reply to this email. They apply on top of v4.9.98-rt76.

Thanks for separating these out Sebastian!

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux