Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] tracing: Add trigger file for trace_markers tracefs/ftrace/print

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Steve,

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:04:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2018 12:13:22 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:49:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Allow writing to the trace_markers file initiate triggers defined in
> > > tracefs/ftrace/print/trigger file. This will allow of user space to trigger
> > > the same type of triggers (including histograms) that the trace events use.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---  
> > 
> > [SNIP]
> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> > > index e3a658bac10f..de3fce14cd00 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_entries.h
> > > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(bprint, bprint_entry,
> > >  	FILTER_OTHER
> > >  );
> > >  
> > > -FTRACE_ENTRY(print, print_entry,
> > > +FTRACE_ENTRY_REG(print, print_entry,
> > >  
> > >  	TRACE_PRINT,
> > >  
> > > @@ -242,7 +242,9 @@ FTRACE_ENTRY(print, print_entry,
> > >  	F_printk("%ps: %s",
> > >  		 (void *)__entry->ip, __entry->buf),
> > >  
> > > -	FILTER_OTHER
> > > +	FILTER_OTHER,
> > > +
> > > +	 ftrace_event_register  
> > 
> > I wonder this is still needed since you added __find_event_file()
> > which ignores the reg field.  Maybe I'm missing something..
> 
> No, that's not the reason for it. The reason is due to the
> event_trigger_callback() function. I'll update the changelog to specify
> this.
> 
> We have something like:
> 
>  # echo snapshot > events/ftrace/print/trigger
> 
> Which will do:
> 
>   event_trigger_write() {
>     event_trigger_regex_write() {
>       trigger_process_regex() {
>         for p in trigger_commands {
>           p->func(); /* trigger_snapshot_cmd->func */
>             event_trigger_callback() {
>               cmd_ops->reg() /* register_trigger() */ {
>                 trace_event_trigger_enable_disable() {
>                   trace_event_enable_disable() {
>                     call->class->reg();
> 
> Without this patch, we jump to NULL and BOOM!

Thanks for the explanation.  I wonder we can skip calling
trace_event_enable_disable() for events which have the
TRACE_EVENT_FL_IGNORE_ENABLE flag.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux