On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:44:32 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:24:34 -0500 > Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah, I agree - I'd rather get it right than get it in now. I thought > > this made sense, and was based on input from Masami, which I may have > > misinterpreted, but I'll wait for some more ideas about the best way to > > do this. > > Too bad we are not closer to November, as this would actually be a good > Plumbers topic. Maybe it's not that important and we should wait until > then. I'd like to get some brain storming ideas out before we decide on > anything, and this is something I believe is better done face to face > than over email. OK, sounds good for me too :) My point was that printk buffer is not good place for the parser error of ftrace, nor each sub-features (like hist, trigger, probe_events etc.) has different place to show it. I just want to unify the user experience over the ftrace UI. Thanks, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
