On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:04:18PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> +void swake_add_all_wq(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct wake_q_head *wq)
> {
> struct swait_queue *curr;
>
> while (!list_empty(&q->task_list)) {
>
> curr = list_first_entry(&q->task_list, typeof(*curr),
> task_list);
> list_del_init(&curr->task_list);
> + wake_q_add(wq, curr->task);
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(swake_add_all_wq);
>
> void swake_up(struct swait_queue_head *q)
> {
> @@ -66,25 +62,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(swake_up);
> */
> void swake_up_all(struct swait_queue_head *q)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> + DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wq);
>
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
> + swake_add_all_wq(q, &wq);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
>
> + wake_up_q(&wq);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(swake_up_all);
This is fundamentally wrong. The whole point of wake_up_all() is that
_all_ is unbounded and should not ever land in a single critical
section, be it IRQ or PREEMPT disabled. The above does both.
Yes, wake_up_all() is crap, it is also fundamentally incompatible with
in-*irq usage. Nothing to be done about that.
So NAK on this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
