On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:34:43 -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote:
>Is there documentation as to the naming convention?
>patches-4.9.61-rt61.tar.gz
^^^^^^ ^^^^rt patch version
^^^^^^kernel version
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.9.tar.gz
+
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/patch-4.9.61.gz
or
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.9.61.tar.gz
Rt patches that fit to kernel 4.9.61 are all patches
4.9.61-rt*
See also https://cdn.kernel.org/category/releases.html .
>Sadly, I don't see any patches for any 4.9.5? releases. So is there
>any advice as to which patch set I should apply to my kernel?
Is there a good reason that has to be exactly 4.9.5?
Why don't you follow the 4.9 LTS as close a s possible by upgrading to
a kernel version close to an available rt patch.
4.9.73 is from 2017-12-29, see https://cdn.kernel.org/ ,
IOW I would go with kernel 4.9.68 and patch-4.9.68-rt60
If you really want 4.9.5 you could try to do it as Fernando from CCRMA
does:
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2017-December/109022.html
That way a patch might apply automatically with an offset or you
perhaps need to fix it manually.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
