Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf-probe: Improve probing on versioned symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/08/2017 09:54 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:17:51 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/07/2017 12:49 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is the 2nd version of the series for probing on
>>> versioned symbols in libraries. This includes 5 patches
>>> to fix the issues discussed on perf-users ML 
>>> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg04637.html)
>>>
>>> The first version is here; https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/5/1124
>>>
>>> Here is the updates;
>>>
>>> [3/5] Add a description in Documentation/perf-probe.txt
>>> [5/5] Add a description and examples in Documentation/perf-probe.txt
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>> Ack-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks!, is that OK for series? and Acked-by ? B-)

Yes Masami, Acked for the series.

( Sorry, I just forgot to add 'ed' in Acked-by :) )

Thanks,
Ravi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux