On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:33 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I'll run full ltp again, make sure there are no new failure deltas. Haven't done that yet, but I have checked all of the reported failures. time-hrtimer:-Use-softirq-based-wakeups-for-non-RT-threads.patch fixes clock_settime_8-1.run-test, hrtimer:-Update-offset-for-soft-bases.patch fixes the rest. However... homer:..debug/tracing # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test Test PASSED homer:..debug/tracing # chrt -f 1 /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test Ended too late. 1507308976 >> 1507308974 Test FAILED That's a bit troubling. No earlier kernel, rt or not, cares about policy. Either now getting a NAK is less than wonderful, but SCHED_FIFO gets a NAK while SCHED_OTHER walks away with an ACK? -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html