Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.12-rt13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 15:33 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> I'll run full ltp again, make sure there are no new failure deltas.

Haven't done that yet, but I have checked all of the reported failures.

time-hrtimer:-Use-softirq-based-wakeups-for-non-RT-threads.patch fixes
clock_settime_8-1.run-test, hrtimer:-Update-offset-for-soft-bases.patch 
fixes the rest.

However...

homer:..debug/tracing # /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test
Test PASSED
homer:..debug/tracing # chrt -f 1 /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test
Ended too late.  1507308976 >> 1507308974
Test FAILED

That's a bit troubling.  No earlier kernel, rt or not, cares about
policy.  Either now getting a NAK is less than wonderful, but
SCHED_FIFO gets a NAK while SCHED_OTHER walks away with an ACK?

	-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux