Re: [PATCH RT] time/hrtimer: Use softirq based wakeups for non-RT threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:

> Normal wake ups (like clock_nanosleep()) which are performed by normal
> users can easily lead to 2ms latency spikes if (enough) hrtimer wakeups
> are synchronized.
> This patch moves all hrtimers wakeups to the softirq queue unless the
> caller has a RT priority.
>
> Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@xxxxxx>

I can confirm this patch fixes the original problem reported.

I ran an overnight test (about 30 hours total) on two platforms using
cyclictest + hrtimer stress load: configurable number of SCHED_OTHER
threads doing random clock_nanosleep() in up to 1 mS intervals.

Without this patch the max latency recorded was:
  * on dual core, Intel Atom E3825 @ 1.33GHz: 107 uS
  * on dual core, Zynq 7020 @ 667MHz: 261 uS

With this patch the max numbers drop to:
  * on dual core, Intel Atom E3825 @ 1.33GHz: 66 uS
  * on dual core, Zynq 7020 @ 667MHz: 90 uS

The max latency numbers with this patch are in-line with expectations
for these platforms.

Thank you so much,
-Gratian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux