> > No, the correct solution is to convert the preempt_disable into a > > local_lock(), which will be a preempt_disable when PREEMPT_RT is not > > set. Look for other patches that convert preempt_disable() into > > local_lock()s for examples. > > Thanks, I had seen a patch patch by Sebastian for random.c doing that, > will continue in that direction. > I'm assuming you want to end up with common driver code base? Will there eventually be a wrapper upstream to allow that? Or will the rt patch handle those issues? Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
