Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/21] tracing: Reimplement log2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  8 Feb 2017 11:24:58 -0600
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  static void destroy_hist_field(struct hist_field *hist_field)
>  {
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!hist_field)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < HIST_FIELD_OPERANDS_MAX; i++)
> +		destroy_hist_field(hist_field->operands[i]);

Recursive functions get me really nervous. What limits it? Is this user
defined? Perhaps we need to find a better way to handle this that's not
recursive, or at least put in a hard limit of the amount it can recurse.

-- Steve

> +
>  	kfree(hist_field);
>  }
>  
> @@ -377,7 +393,10 @@ static struct hist_field *create_hist_field(struct ftrace_event_field *field,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (flags & HIST_FIELD_FL_LOG2) {
> +		unsigned long fl = flags & ~HIST_FIELD_FL_LOG2;
>  		hist_field->fn = hist_field_log2;
> +		hist_field->operands[0] = create_hist_field(field, fl);
> +		hist_field->size = hist_field->operands[0]->size;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux