Re: Understanding cyclictest result

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-02-03 10:13:15 [+0200], Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,

…
> and got max value of 180usec.
> 
> On comparing my results to resuls examples given in
> https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest
> it seems like a very large number.
> I know it depends on hardware (I am using Atom, one core only.), yet
> becuase I'm not too experienced with it, I am not sure if my real
> problem is HW or doing wrong testing/RTpatch.
> I also see that it is much better then results before applying RT
> patch (3000usec)

So Carsten has
- Atom Z530 @1600 MHz with 382us [0]
- Atom N2800 @1860 MHz with 43us [1]

[0] https://www.osadl.org/Profile-of-system-in-rack-1-slot-8.qa-profile-r1s8.0.html#hwlats
[1] https://www.osadl.org/Profile-of-system-in-rack-c-slot-4.qa-profile-rcs4.0.html#hwlats

> Best Regards,
> Ran

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux