Re: question about rcuc/X tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/15/2016 01:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

On a related note, I found an old email from Paul suggesting that
the various rcuc/X threads could be affined to the management CPUs
to free up the "realtime" cores, but when I try that it doesn't let
me change affinity.  Was that disallowed for technical reasons?
(It's also possible it's something local, in which case I need to go
digging.)

The rcuo/X kthreads can be affined, but the rcuc/X kthreads must run on
the corresponding CPU for correctness reasons -- they communicate with
RCU core using protocols that are only single-CPU-safe.  But if you are
running NO_HZ_FULL, these kthreads should never run unless your user
threads are doing syscalls.

So, are they actually running in your setup?

Yes, but I wasn't setting nohz_full. With "rcu_nocb_poll isolcpus=1-15 rcu_nocbs=1-15 nohz_full=1-15" I'm not seeing the rcuc/X kthreads running.

So in the non-nohz_full case, what are they waking up to do? Something timer-related?

Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux