On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:10:40 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2016-12-06 17:50:30 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > A customer hit a crash where the napi sd->poll_list became corrupted.
> > The customer had the bnx2x driver, which does a
> > __napi_schedule_irqoff() in its interrupt handler. Unfortunately, when
> > running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this interrupt handler is run as a
> > thread and is preemptable. The call to ____napi_schedule() must be done
> > with interrupts disabled to protect the per cpu softnet_data's
> > poll_list, which is protected by disabling interrupts (disabling
> > preemption is enough when all interrupts are threaded and
> > local_bh_disable() can't preempt).
> >
> > As bnx2x isn't the only driver that does this, the safest thing to do
> > is to make __napi_schedule_irqoff() call __napi_schedule() instead when
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled, which will call local_irq_save()
> > before calling ____napi_schedule().
>
> It would work RT wise. But don't have the same problem if you boot the
> kernel with threadirqs ?
>
I thought the same at first, but looking into the code for forced
threaded interrupts, I saw this:
local_bh_disable();
ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action);
local_bh_enable();
Where without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, local_bh_disable() also disables
preemption. Then all the handlers still can not be preempted by another
handler. So it appears to be safe as well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
