On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:25:43AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:40:14 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On top of which, the implementation had issues; now I know you're the > > blinder kind of person that disregards everything not in his immediate > > interest, but if you'd looked at the patch you'd have seen he'd added > > code the idle entry path, which will slow down every single to-idle > > transition. > > Isn't to-idle a bit bloated anyway? Or has that been fixed. I know > there was some issues with idle_balance() which can add latency to > wakeups. idle_balance() is also in the to-idle path. > Yes it is too heavy as is, but just stacking more crap in just because its already expensive seems to wrong way around. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
