Re: Making rcu_normal=1 in RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:21:14 -0500
Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:12:51AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We have the following patch applied to the RT tree:
> > 
> >   commit a9d3cc781a3306bfa332fa7cb6134b70696058d5
> >   Author: Josh Cartwright <joshc@xxxxxx>
> >   Date:   Tue Oct 27 07:31:53 2015 -0500
> >   
> >       net: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() conditional on !RT_FULL
> > 
> > However, as noted by Michael, making rcu_normal=1 default in the
> > RT kernel should have the same effect (ie.  not calling
> > synchronize_sched_expedited()).
> > 
> > So, honest question, is there a reason not to:
> > 
> >  1. Drop the patch above
> >  2. Make rcu_normal=1 default?  
> 
> I think this is probably a cleaner way to fix the problems which
> motivated this patch in the first place.  In my defense, the above patch
> predates rcu_normal :).

No need to defend yourself! We debugged this very spike in one of
our kernels that don't have rcu_normal. We decided to do exactly
what you're doing before looking at upstream. Your patch helped
us confirm that we were in the right track.

> Something like this, perhaps?

Looks good, but (honest question) what does it buy us using
rcu_normal_after_boot vs rcu_normal? Is the boot process
improved someway?

As long as we're rcu_normal=1 before launching user-space,
this should be fine.

> 
>    Julia
> 
> -- 8< --
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: enable rcu_normal_after_boot by default for RT
> 
> The forcing of an expedited grace period is an expensive and very
> RT-application unfriendly operation, as it forcibly preempts all running
> tasks on CPUs which are preventing the gp from expiring.
> 
> By default, as a policy decision, disable the expediting of grace
> periods (after boot) on configurations which enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL.
> 
> Suggested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> index b40d346..4975917 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("rcupdate");
>  #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
>  module_param(rcu_expedited, int, 0);
>  module_param(rcu_normal, int, 0);
> -static int rcu_normal_after_boot;
> +static int rcu_normal_after_boot = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL);
>  module_param(rcu_normal_after_boot, int, 0);
>  #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux