On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:25:21 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Steven Rostedt | 2016-08-04 10:57:09 [-0400]: > > >diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c > >new file mode 100644 > >index 000000000000..08dfabe4e862 > >--- /dev/null > >+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c > … > >+/* Macros to encapsulate the time capturing infrastructure */ > >+#define time_type u64 > >+#define time_get() trace_clock_local() > >+#define time_to_us(x) div_u64(x, 1000) > >+#define time_sub(a, b) ((a) - (b)) > >+#define init_time(a, b) (a = b) > >+#define time_u64(a) a > > Do we need a macro for this? In the old code we could choose between > CONFIG_TRACING but now we don't. > Probably not, I kept it for two reasons. 1) to keep the same logic as what was in PREEMPT_RT, and 2) in case we can come up with a better clock. But it's not that important. Should it be nuked? They do somewhat make the code easier to read. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
