On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:05:04 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There should be no need to hold the base lock during the wakeup. There > should be no boosting involved, the wakeup list has its own lock so it > should be safe to do this without the lock. > > Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Nothing against this patch, but as you marked it for stable, can you add to the change log what issue you had that caused you to make this change? -- Steve > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/time/timer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c > index b3c3d3a6216f..716ef84a5d87 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timer.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c > @@ -1313,8 +1313,8 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct tvec_base *base) > } > } > } > - wakeup_timer_waiters(base); > spin_unlock_irq(&base->lock); > + wakeup_timer_waiters(base); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
