Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] softirq: split timer softirqs out of ksoftirqd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've been running with this patch on ARM (dra7 SOC, which is a
dual-core A15) with a 4.1.18-rt17 kernel for a while without any
noticeable problems. Boosting the ktimersoftd processes on both cores
to a higher priority fixed some timing problems my userspace
application was seeing too.

The userspace application in question has a repeating timerfd in an
epoll and spends most of its time in blocking epoll_wait calls. Under
system load (most from other lower-RT-priority userspace processes),
it was seeing several-ms delays between the timerfd interrupt
happening and ksoftirqd running the HRTIMER softirq to wake it up.
That was with ksoftirqd running as SCHED_OTHER, which is what it
defaulted to. The priority inversion between the userspace processes
is gone after making ktimersoftd the same priority as the
highest-priority application.

Tested-by: Brian Silverman <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux