Re: RT, what to do about up/down_read_non_owner()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 09:49 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 08:57 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > In v4.7, Al added those buggers to NFS.  BCACHE is disabled in RT
> > because of same.. but that's a somewhat suboptimal solution for
> > something as widely used as NFS.
> > 
> > Suggestions?  I reverted the offending commit to get 4.7-rt up and
> > running, but that's not gonna fly long term.
> 
> This API should be avoided according to the comment and completions
> should be used. I am for removal of those. Were the locking people okay
> with this change in the first place or did this just sneak in?

It just snuck in.  Al reworked sillyunlink, whacking the wait_event()
stuff that was there, using annoying $subject instead.

	-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux