[PATCH RT] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index d66b1aef2083..d044cea59f54 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -244,7 +244,11 @@ ENDPROC(__irq_svc)
 	bne	1b
 	tst	r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
 	reteq	r8				@ go again
-	b	1b
+	ldr	r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY]	@ get preempt lazy count
+	teq	r0, #0				@ if preempt lazy count != 0
+	beq	1b
+	ret	r8				@ go again
+
 #endif
 
 __und_fault:
-- 
2.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux