On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes. > I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good > for inclusion. ping? > > Original intro: > > In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under > trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency > specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4. > > This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this > is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't > ditch all tracing support from cyclictest... > > Luiz Capitulino (4): > cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace > cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function > cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function > cyclictest: add --tracemark option > > src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
