On 18/01/2016 at 21:30:13 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote : > Well, if it works properly and does not lead to any new bugs or > anything else then nobody will mind I guess. > Yeah, the DT guys were not happy about the patch set, I'll try to work around using DT ;) > >> All in all, care to forwarded the working pieces from -RT patch set > >> upstream? I problem I have here is mostly that I can't the patches on > >> actual hardware. Disabling the PIT and running on the other clocksource > >> isn't that -RT specific after all :) > > > > I'd say that the only remaining part is the IRQ freeing/requesting but > > as I said, this can't land in mainline as is. I still plan to work on > > that later. > > I'd say that most people running linux on at91 are already using the tcb > > as the clocksource, this is already available in the mainline and is the > > default unless the TCBs are used for something else. > > Wasn't there one of the patches to increase the frequency of the TCB > clocksource from the default to something higher? > Indeed, it may be worth mainlining that one. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
