On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:30:55 +0100 Carsten Emde <C.Emde@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So the question is whether you still encourage me to write the RFC for > upstream inclusion of the current code after some polishing - maybe, in the > hope that someone will come up with the framework during RFC discussion - > or we better wait, since writing an RFC for hopeless code really doesn't > make sense. Note, the latency measurement code is basically the last code that is practically untouched from what was in the original latency-tracer code from the -rt patch. It's been on my todo list to update it for some time. There's a few things lacking with it. I want to improve that. Perhaps this should be done before pushing in a histogram infrastructure on top of it. I'll move this up on my priority list. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
