Re: cyclictest versus custom SPI based system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julio,
On 01/14/2016 10:11 AM, Julio Cruz Barroso wrote:
> 
> I changed the policy:priority as you suggested and the system is stable now!! I will prepare
 an application to measure the latency with some loads during long periods (but this is another thing).
> 
> For reference, in my case (iMX6), the priority adjustment was done at spi.c (master->rt). A patch 
was suggested to implement this by device tree but other opinion said that this sound like a Linux
 specific feature/implementation [4]. Anyways, this is another issue.
> 

Just curios, is it possible for you to achieve the same results from User space using chrt/taskset utils?
(without Kernel modification).

For example, I can see below processes on my system:
  184 root         0 SW   [spi32766]
and our QSPI driver don't use IRQs.
 

> [4] Patch to implement SPI RT in device tree: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348713.html
> 

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux