On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 11/24/2015 02:03 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > The API provided by wait.h and swait.h is very similiar. Most of the > > time your are only one character away from either of it: > > > > wake_up() vs swake_up() > > > > This is on purpose so that we do not have two nearly identical bits of > > infrastructre code with dissimilar names. > > > > A compile time type check assertion ensures that obvious wrong usage > > is caught at early stage. > > Obviously, this didn't really work as one can see with patch #4. That > one just compiled. So I wrapped almost all functions to get a better > check coverage. woken_wake_function(), autoremove_wake_function() and > wake_bit_function() can't be wrapped easily because DEFINE_WAIT and > friends. I just left them out. > > The result looks pretty bad in my opinion. Probably it would be > better do add -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types to the CFLAGS. That's really bad. If we can pull off the -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types trick, that would solve it nicely. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
