On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, John Kacur wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Javier Sanz wrote: > > > Sorry, > > > > make NUMA=0 > > > > Tx > > > > 2015-10-26 11:56 GMT+01:00 Javier Sanz <jsanza@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am trying to compile rt-tests-0.96 and i got : > > > > > > root@darkstar rt-tests-0.96]# make > > > gcc -D VERSION=0.96 -c src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c -Wall -Wno-nonnull > > > -O2 -DNUMA -D_GNU_SOURCE -Isrc/include -o bld/cyclictest.o > > > In file included from src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c:39:0: > > > src/cyclictest/rt_numa.h:29:18: fatal error: numa.h: No such file or directory > > > compilation terminated. > > > Makefile:87: recipe for target 'bld/cyclictest.o' failed > > > make: *** [bld/cyclictest.o] Error 1 > > > [root@darkstar rt-tests-0.96]# > > > > > > > > > why do i need to get numa.h ?? > > > > > > Tx > > -- > > I think the original thinking was that it is a trivial thing to install > the numa libs even if you are not going to use them, but I have personally Should read, "I have NEVER liked this" :) > liked this. I could imagine that this requirement is not > always so simple in the embedded space. I'll look into seeing if I can > remove this. (or try yourself, and send me a patch.) > > Thanks > > John > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
