problems with chained IRQ handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Chained IRQ handlers are always marked IRQ_NOTHREAD, which means
forced threading doesn't apply to them. I think this means they can't
safely use non-raw spinlocks under CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL. Is this
correct?

I have an ARM system with a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL kernel which prints
lockdep warnings from many places because of this. It also locks up
under moderate load, which I think is related to this issue. Any
suggestions?

Thanks,
Brian Silverman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux