Hi, all Just want to check if anyone is working to bring the "timers: do not raise softirq unconditionally" back? Seems it's not in the 4.1.3-rt yet. Thanks --jyh > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rt-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rt-users- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 6:39 AM > To: Mike Galbraith > Cc: Steven Rostedt; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rt-users; Thomas > Gleixner; Carsten Emde; John Kacur; Gortmaker, Paul (Wind River) > Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/4] Revert "timers: do not raise softirq > unconditionally" > > * Mike Galbraith | 2015-03-25 03:33:53 [+0100]: > > >Nah, I was referring to get_next_timer_interrupt() because I saw that > >rt_spin_unlock_after_trylock_in_irq(&base->lock) sitting there. > > Hmm. Good question. But it was Ingo who introduced the lock, so it might > have special Ingo magic included. > > > -Mike > > Sebastian > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ǫ���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
